Consumer Product Safety Commission add Magnetix to recall list
Posted Saturday, May 19, 2007 by Ed Harper.
CPSC finally has acted this in regulating Magnetix, the popular toy, made by Rose Art, is subject to a recall due to continued complaints from consumers. Complaints have ranged from the toy falling apart to even death by young infants who have swallowed magnetic pieces within the toys. Magnets which have been ingested can attaach within the intestines and digestive systems wreaking havoc on the the young children’s bodies.
According to the Chicago Tribune in a recent article to date, at least 27 children have suffered serious intestinal injuries after swallowing loose Magnetix magnets. More than 1,500 complaints have come in regarding magnetic pieces falling out of the toys. CPSC has stated that the following: boxes labeled for ages 6 and older that carry a tiny caution label about the risk of internal injuries from swallowed magnets.
The article points out the problems within the CPSC with shrunken staff and limited authority. Parents need to watch out for the safety of their children as some companies are not acting in their children’s best interests. In short, individuals have suffered and died because of an inability to maintain watch on companies that are only concerned with their bottom line.
We Are Here to Help
Although our office does not handle all types of cases, we hope you will contact us regarding any legal issues you may encounter. We will answer your questions, or refer you to another quality and trustworthy attorney if we are unable to assist you.
Blog Archive
- 2012 (1)
- 2011 (29)
- July (1)
- June (3)
- May (2)
- April (20)
- Contracting an infectious disease from a health care provider
- How do I handle a personal injury claim when liability is clear?
- To what extent is an injury considered in a criminal charge of assault?
- Property damage claim when liability is clear
- Malpractice - what are the elements?
- Bankruptcy estates and personal injury claims
- If a hospital fails to bill me or my PIP insurance four years after an accident, is there an obligation to pay them?
- A friend was driving with a young driver with a permit and no insurance, can the friend be sued?
- In California, what is the length of time for a medical malpractice statute of limitations?
- Why does PIP have to be reimbursed?
- Failure to diagnose an ankle fracture
- Analysis of a Personal Injury case and how a private investigator can help
- Slip and Fall at apartment complex
- Is a house always an asset?
- What is Bad Faith?
- Why would you accept policy limits for an insurance company?
- Expunging or Vacating a Prior Conviction
- Moving Violation - Do I have to go to Court?
- NFL Players and NFL Owners begin Mediation
- Recent over-exertion in 13 Iowa Hawkeye football players leads them to hospital
- February (1)
- January (2)
- 2010 (10)
- November (2)
- August (1)
- June (1)
- May (3)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- 2009 (5)
- November (2)
- October (1)
- September (1)
- February (1)
- 2008 (3)
- August (1)
- June (1)
- April (1)
- 2007 (43)
- December (1)
- November (2)
- September (1)
- August (3)
- July (16)
- False Assumption - 9. My neighbor settled her own claim
- False Assumption - 8. All my medical bills will be paid
- False Assumption - 7. The pain has generally gone away
- False Assumption - 6. The insurance company for the other driver will believe me
- False Assumption - 5. My injuries are not that bad
- False Assumption - 4. I had prior injuries
- False Assumption - 3. The property damage estimate is accurate because a professional adjuster looked at my car
- False Assumption - 2. The other driver admitted fault for the accident, so I don't think I need to call the police.
- False Assumption - 1. Insurance company and insurance company representatives are on your side.
- 10 False assumptions that people make following an accident
- Spine injury prevention
- Recovering from a car accident
- After a car accident, getting your bills paid
- Car accident anatomy 101
- Call the police after a collision and know your location when you call
- Injuries in Motor Vehicle Collision #2
- June (1)
- May (2)
- April (2)
- March (5)
- February (10)
- Uninsured and Underinsured Motorist Coverage: Is it necessary?
- Personal Injury Protection Insurance: Do you need it?
- Are drinking fountains safe?
- Sound Transit: Obayahsi Construction Company failure to abide by safety rules leads to death
- Chlorine Chemical leak due to worker error: Corporate blame game should not go unnoticed
- Airbags: Do benefits outweigh the risks?
- New Sonic stadium: Should it be funded by the taxpayers?
- Recent CNN investigation points out insurance claims abuse
- Prescription drug errors in recent years have drastically increased death rate
- Proposed legislation will require drivers to provide proof of insurance upon licensing
- 2006 (5)
- August (1)
- July (3)
- June (1)
- Harper Law PLLC
-
826 6th Street South, Suite 101
Kirkland, WA 98033-6740 - Telephone
- 425.284.3333
Toll-Free 877.780.2800
Fax 425.284.4286
24 hour voicemail - info@edharperlaw.com
- Office Hours
- Monday - Friday
8:00 am to 5:00 pm
Weekend and evening appointments available on request
